How To Publish My Research Paper

So I don’t want to wait to share a polished piece because I want to know early on if I’m barking up the wrong tree.If readers think I’m just wasting my time with a silly argument or if it’s a topic that nobody cares about or if it’s a topic that’s already been addressed that I wasn’t aware of, then I try to sort of nip that in the bud so I’m not wasting time and stuff like that.

So I don’t want to wait to share a polished piece because I want to know early on if I’m barking up the wrong tree.If readers think I’m just wasting my time with a silly argument or if it’s a topic that nobody cares about or if it’s a topic that’s already been addressed that I wasn’t aware of, then I try to sort of nip that in the bud so I’m not wasting time and stuff like that.It’ll only really make sense to focus on one author’s topic if you are following up on an article within the particular issue of a journal, but that’s usually a smaller article, not a feature-length kind of 20 page thing.

Tags: The Review Of Literature For ResearchNeed Help With Essay WritingCharity Begins At Home EssayBuy Essays For CollegeVegetarianism ThesisPe Homework SheetsLiterature Review IdeasSat Essay Prompt College BoardKakuro Research Paper

Something I forgot to mention from earlier is when I’m engaging the particular authors that I want to critique, I try to be Socratic.

I try to give an internal critique of their arguments, so as much as possible.

So I say well, they have this particular premise that I share with them, but I think that that premise actually leads to different conclusions than they support.

I think that’s a really powerful way to engage people who disagree with you on a particular issue without just butting heads.

These are two particular authors or topics to use as sort of the foil of my article.

Preferably these are things that have been published as recent articles in high tier journals, maybe the highest tier journal in the discipline.

That may be a sign that you’re a well-read scholar or it may be a sign that you’re trying too hard.

I’ve never had an issue with let’s say referees saying, “well you didn’t cite enough stuff.” There may be other issues that I’ve had with papers that referees have found, but it’s not been a matter of the citation.

So there’s no sort of hard-and-fast set of criteria for determining when is this ready to go out, but I would say that you shouldn’t tinker with a paper endlessly.

Once it feels roughly finished, then I think that’s when you should submit it.